<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IceNews - Daily News &#187; standard and poor&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.icenews.is/index.php/information/standard-and-poors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.icenews.is</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:11:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;No&#8217; to Icesave does not damage Iceland&#8217;s credit rating</title>
		<link>http://www.icenews.is/index.php/2010/03/09/no-to-icesave-does-not-damage-icelands-credit-rating/</link>
		<comments>http://www.icenews.is/index.php/2010/03/09/no-to-icesave-does-not-damage-icelands-credit-rating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Icesave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standard and poor's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icenews.is/?p=12840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The result of Iceland&#8217;s so-called Icesave referendum has no effect on the creditworthiness of the nation, at least not directly. This is the conclusion of the ratings agency Standard and Poor&#8217;s, which published its report yesterday. The fact that the &#8216;no&#8217; vote was so widely predicted means the outcome of the vote has had no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="attachment wp-att-12841 alignleft" src="http://www.icenews.is/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/kronur.jpg" alt="kronur" width="150" height="99" />The result of Iceland&#8217;s so-called Icesave referendum has no effect on the creditworthiness of the nation, at least not directly.<span id="more-12840"></span> This is the conclusion of the ratings agency Standard and Poor&#8217;s, which published its report yesterday.</p>
<p>The fact that the &#8216;no&#8217; vote was so widely predicted means the outcome of the vote has had no effect on Iceland&#8217;s creditworthiness. Standard and Poor&#8217;s also makes special note in its report that the referendum rejected a proposed repayment plan from December; it did not reject repayment of Icesave deposits to the Netherlands and the UK altogether.</p>
<p>The report says Iceland&#8217;s sovereign credit rating will be revisited once it has become clear whether or not the referendum has had an effect on Iceland&#8217;s international IMF-led reconstruction package. The IMF&#8217;s latest review is due soon. There is still a lot of uncertainty surrounding Iceland&#8217;s rescue package while the Icesave issue goes unresolved.</p>
<p>Standard and Poor&#8217;s has already taken into account the fact that the Icesave issue could potentially remain unresolved for a long time due to upcoming elections in both the Netherlands and the UK; but believes, on the other hand, that the Icelandic government will not fall due to Icesave, RUV reports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.icenews.is/index.php/2010/03/09/no-to-icesave-does-not-damage-icelands-credit-rating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

