The foreign affairs spokesman for the Danish People’s Party has suggested bombing Libyan rebels in order to remain neutral in NATO’s campaign against embattled dictator Muammar Gaddafi. Soren Espersen’s remarks, which were made in parliament last week, were met by a chorus of head-shaking and tutting from both sides of the political spectrum, including his traditional allies, The Copenhagen Post reports.
Espersen suggested that the international coalition should blow up the rebels’ weapons to prevent the continuation of civil war. “We can’t have that. Then it’s a new situation. Then we might also have to destroy their combat vehicles,” he said.
“The situation is very complex. What do we do if rebels, with heavy artillery, make headway? We cannot accept that the one side is picked off as they drive around in their combat vehicles, while the other side gets a free pass to continue. I don’t think that the rebels are any gentler than the other side,” he added.
According to Politiken, even the party’s usual political allies, the Liberals and Conservatives, were shocked by Espersen’s suggestion.
“We are totally against that. We don’t accept that Gaddafi has a legitimate right to rule the country. We therefore have to try to build a good relationship with the rebels and open an active dialogue with them,” said Michael Aastrup Jensen, the foreign affairs spokesperson for the prime minister’s Liberal Party. “We’re not going to get off on the right foot by bombing them,” he added.
The Conservative Party’s foreign affairs spokesperson, Naser Khader, commented: “It shocks me. I don’t understand what Soren Espersen is thinking. He needs to stop.”
Of course Espersen has a point. The whole thing was a big lie, and Scandinavians (Icelanders less though) are extremely naive and believe what the media tell them about world affairs.
The West backed the rebels from the beginning but they still couldn’t beat the Libyan army. And even with months of bombing, Qadhaafi is still there, by this point, certainly, the victim.
Exactly. They should finally take the decision about whether they’ll provide the full support to the rebels or not. Otherwise a number of unintended consequences may arise and the situation in Libya will more and more resemble the undesired outcome of the war in Iraq.
Only if you used neutron bombs.
He actually has a point. Either we support the rebels openly, or we support a defacto split of Libya into its two historical provinces. Pretending that there is a third way is silly, as if the rebels move into Tripoli with armour after a long civil war they’re just as likely to kill civilians as Gaddafi. (Although I doubt they’ll make the mistake of announcing it :) ).
Following his “logic”, the best course would be to “Nuke ” the entire country to stop the fighting!